Peer Review Process
Research in Education, Technology, and Multiculture applies a double-blind peer review process for all manuscripts submitted. Each article undergoes evaluation by at least two reviewers who possess expertise relevant to the subject matter. The peer review process ensures the quality, originality, and credibility of published works.
The review process in this journal proceeds through the following stages:
-
Submission of Manuscript
Authors submit manuscripts through the journal’s online submission system (Open Journal Systems – OJS). -
Initial Editorial Screening
The editorial office checks whether the submission fits the journal’s focus and scope, and whether it complies with the author guidelines in terms of structure and format. At this stage, manuscripts are also evaluated for basic quality standards, including the absence of major methodological flaws. All submissions passing this step are screened with Turnitin to ensure originality and avoid plagiarism. -
Evaluation by the Editor-in-Chief
The Editor-in-Chief assesses the manuscript’s relevance, novelty, and contribution. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without further review. -
Reviewer Invitation
Suitable reviewers are selected based on their expertise, relevance to the topic, and absence of conflicts of interest. This journal implements a double-blind review, meaning that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the process. -
Reviewer’s Response
Invited reviewers consider the request based on their expertise, availability, and potential conflicts of interest. They may accept or decline the invitation. When declining, reviewers are encouraged to suggest alternative experts. -
Conducting the Review
Reviewers examine the manuscript carefully, often in multiple readings, and provide constructive, point-by-point feedback. Based on their assessment, reviewers recommend one of the following decisions: accept, minor revision, major revision, or rejection. -
Editorial Consideration of Reviews
The editorial team evaluates all review reports before making a decision. If there are significant differences in reviewers’ recommendations, an additional reviewer may be invited to provide further evaluation. -
Decision and Feedback to Authors
Authors receive a decision letter along with anonymous reviewer comments. This feedback is intended to guide authors in revising and improving their manuscript. Reviewers are also informed of the final decision regarding the article they reviewed. -
Revision and Final Decision
If revisions are required, authors must resubmit the corrected version according to reviewers’ and editors’ suggestions. In cases of major revisions, the revised manuscript may be re-evaluated by the original reviewers. For minor revisions, the handling editor may decide without additional review. Once the editor is satisfied with the revisions, the manuscript is accepted.
